--Natan Meir, widower of the mother of six, who was murdered by a Palestinian teen inside her settlement.
APN's Lara Friedman takes part in discussion following show on Israel-Palestine in DC (1/19/2016, Foreign Policy in Focus)
Peace Now condemns West Bank land expropriation (1/21/2016, AP/Boston Globe)
Peace Now: Netanyahu government expropriates 370 acres in West Bank (1/20/2016, AP/ABC News)
Peace Now: Netanyahu government returning to land expropriations in the West Bank (1/20/2016, Reuters)
Peace Now report: Right-wing Israeli nonprofits hide their funding sources (1/19/2016, Jewschool blog)
This week, Alpher discusses why he has had so little discussion on issues related directly to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and prospects for new negotiations recently; whether, even if that’s the case regarding the PLO in the West Bank, we can ignore assessments regarding Hamas and Hezbollah activity there, alongside predictions regarding violence emanating from Gaza, extremist inclinations among the Israeli Arab community, and even a high-level forecast of ISIS activity against Israel; the angry Israeli reaction to US Ambassador Dan Shapiro's statement that Israel exercises a legal double standard in its approach to Israeli settlers as opposed to Palestinians in the West Bank; and whether Israeli-Turkish negotiations regarding normalization of bilateral relations hold out any hope for a better situation in Gaza.
The strength of organizations working to end the occupation and their supporters is greater than we think.
One day the occupation will end. It will probably happen in one fell swoop. And when it happens, it will suddenly
emerge that everyone was against it. That the politicians had actually worked to end it, that the journalists
strove indefatigably to expose its injustices, that the cultural institutions condemned it courageously and that
Israeli academia was a center of persistent resistance, from which the struggle drew ideological and moral backing.
In short, everyone was part of the Resistance.
The current U.S. and EU approaches are similar in that both bar producers and exporters of products made in settlements from indicating that the point of origin of the products is Israel. The approaches differ, however, in how far they go. U.S. labeling, in effect, differentiates between Israel on the one hand, and the West Bank/Gaza on the other. The EU differentiates not only between Israel and the West Bank, but within the West Bank between Israeli and Palestinian goods. This difference reflects, fundamentally, the different historical and economic circumstances in which the respective regulations were adopted.
In 2014, opponents of boycotts, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) against Israel began promoting legislation in various U.S. states denouncing the BDS movement.
In 2015, these efforts shifted/expanded to mirror efforts in the U.S. Congress to hijack concerns about BDS against Israel in order to pass legislation mandating that Israeli settlements be treated, in effect, as part of sovereign Israel.
At the outset of 2016, it is already clear that these efforts are continuing and building. Indeed, the clear trend at the state-level is moving away from anti-BDS resolutions in favor of binding legislation to – in effect – have states boycott, divest from, and sanction companies that engage in BDS against Israel, or that in any concrete way differentiate between Israel and the settlements.
This table --
which will be updated regularly and which is based on data drawn from the websites of the various state
legislatures -- is intended to help people understand and follow what is happening at the state
level.
(Do you know about legislation missing from the table? Please let me know - LFriedman@peacenow.org).