Camp David II: Assumptions and Consequences

Shibley Telhami | Current History (January 2001)
Examination of what led to the failure of the 2000 Camp David negotiations, including an analysis of the issue of Jerusalem and how it led to the collapse of the talks. Misplaced assumptions about the Middle East are also addressed, as well as the increasing transformation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from a nationalist to a religious one. PDF > (requires ProQuest login)

comments powered by Disqus