American interests will be worse off without two states. But it’s time to consider how we might make the best
of that bad situation.
By Daniel Shapiro, former U.S. Ambassador to Israel
Last week, as President Trump’s Middle East team was preparing to arrive in Israel for another round of preliminary
talks with Israeli and Palestinian officials, State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert offered a rather
startling defense of the Administration’s refusal to endorse a two-state solution. She said that to do so would be
a sign of “bias.”
She’s right, of course. It would indeed show bias toward the only outcome that can truly serve the interests of the
United States—as recognized by three previous administrations—not to mention Israelis, Palestinians, and the Middle
East as a whole.
But her remark reinforced a thought I’ve been chewing on since early 2013: maybe it’s time that the United States
consider options other than a two-state solution.
Wait. Don’t get the wrong idea. Let me put my cards on the table.
I’ve been supporting the goal of Israel and a Palestinian state living side by side in peace and security since
1988. It hit me early in the days of the first Intifada that there was no other solution, which made me something
of an early adopter of that position among advocates for Israel.
I’ve spent 20 years in government service, in two administrations and on Capitol Hill, working toward this goal,
advocating, advancing, and protecting efforts to achieve it.
Israeli-Palestinian peace efforts were the single most prominent aspect of my assignments in the Obama
Administration at the National Security Council and as U.S. Ambassador to Israel. I can attest to the commitment
that President Obama, Secretaries of State Clinton and Kerry, and Special Envoys George Mitchell and Martin Indyk
demonstrated to helping Israelis and Palestinians achieve the dream of two states. We were not successful, but I
will always be proud to have joined them in this noble cause.
And to this moment, nothing has changed my mind, or my analysis, about which outcome to this seemingly endless
conflict is best for the United States, for securing Israel’s future as a Jewish and democratic state, for
Palestinians’ legitimate goals of self-determination in a state of their own, and for opening up relations between
Israel and the Arab world.
Read More