Israel’s new government should be seen as a call to action for anyone who cares about Israel’s
future, about its character and about its wellbeing. This call applies not only to citizens of the state of
Israel, but also – maybe even mainly – to those who are looking at Israel from outside, and, as outsiders, are
best positioned to put a mirror before the Israeli public, to serve as a reality check.
The reality is that this government distinctly represents and expresses what the enlightened world, including progressive Americans who care deeply about Israel, have in recent years grown to resent about Israel’s conservative political elite.
The reality is that this political elite, characterized by a combination of jingoistic nationalism and religious conservatism, ethnocentrism and xenophobia, intolerance of dissent and disrespect for basic democratic principles, represents a set of values that is diametrically opposed to the values that most Americans, particularly young Americans, hold dear. More to the point, the reality is that this combination of reactionary beliefs, often zealously proclaimed in the name of Judaism, is the very antithesis of what most American Jews define as “Jewish values.”


The coalition agreement between the Likud and the Jewish Home party (Bayit Yehudi) reveals the
plans of the new government and indicates its intentions, including:
I am a product of the '60's. I demonstrated against the Viet Nam war, marched for civil rights and
against racism. I have boycotted lettuce and grapes, in support of the United Farmworkers; Dow, for
manufacturing napalm during the Viet Nam war; Coors, for discriminatory hiring practices against people of color
and gays; Nestlé, for its aggressive campaign to sell breast milk substitute to young mothers in developing
countries; Target, for its significant contributions to Tom Emmer, the rightwing candidate for Minnesota
Governor whose agenda included positions I abhorred on everything; and Walmart, for its poor labor practices
(except when my mother Ruth Epstein, who turns 100 this August, insists on going there “for the bargains”).